Although the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party will undergo a transition, national policies will continue to prioritize climate-change and environmental issues, with an unwavering focus on clean, efficient approaches to producing and consuming energy. Professionals operating in China should continue to focus on improving efficiencies in the industrial, buildings and construction sectors, said officials at last fall’s 18th National People’s Congress.

The current trajectory is laid out in the 12th Five-Year Plan (FYP), regarded as a blueprint for China’s overall goals and objectives. “[These goals] undergo constant review and revision over the course of the five-year cycle,” according to APCO, a public affairs and strategic communications firm. The FYP was last ratified in March 2011.

The previous version of the FYP strongly emphasized efficiency in the industrial energy sector, which comprises 70% of China’s total energy use. However, at that time, “by global comparisons, China was still inefficient, so there was a lot of low-hanging fruit to take advantage of,” said Deborah Seligsohn, principal adviser for the China Climate and Energy Program (CCEP) at the World Resources Institute.

One of CCEP’s most lauded initiatives, the Top 1,000 Energy-Consuming Enterprises Program, improved energy performance by giving companies clear benchmarks and by closing many small factories. The goal was to attain 20% energy intensity; China reached 19.1%. “China has already taken many of the easier steps to boost its industrial energy efficiency,” according to the China Sustainable Energy Program (CSEP) in its October 2011 report, “China Kick-Starts Its Clean Energy.” Further gains, however, will be more difficult to realize.

The 12th Five-Year Plan

The new energy-intensity reduction target is 16%, a reduced percentage that takes into account the difficulties of attaining additional efficiencies.

The government has decided to expand to 10,000 the Top 1,000 Energy-Consuming Enterprises Program. It is expected to affect 15,000 to 16,000 firms that account for almost 85% of the energy used by China’s industrial sector, or about 60% of China’s overall energy consumption.

The Top 1,000 program primarily targeted construction-materials manufacturing, but now the government has started working with a number of other sectors, observes Taryn Sullivan, founder and CEO of Efficiency Exchange, which is helping Chinese factories become more energy-efficient. “The more heavy-industry guys, they have already been through it,” she says.

Seligsohn notes, “Once you’ve done the big industries, the saving per unit per investment goes down.” As well as adding new industries—for example, textiles—there is a need to restructure and reform companies, rather than just closing them. From the Top 1,000, explains Seligsohn, “you have one-third of China’s primary energy output. With 10,000 companies, you only get an additional 20%.”

Premier Wen Jiabao has stated that China will put in place “well-equipped statistical and monitoring systems for greenhouse-gas emissions, energy conservation and emissions reductions.” One such example is the so-called ISO 500001 policy, which establishes a framework to manage energy for industrial plants, commercial facilities and entire organizations.

Sullivan predicts increased cooperation with utilities to deal with demand-side management, which includes setting regulations and “requiring [the Top 10,000] invest with these companies and work with users to reduce load and usage at certain times to reduce stress overall on [the] power distribution network during peak time.”

Additionally, the plan specifically endorses market approaches, such as using energy-services companies to help finance energy efficiency.

Buildings Boom

Buildings are gaining more attention with the current FYP. Seligsohn notes that “standards are reasonably enforced in construction.” Also, clearly defined and rigorous regulations are increasingly being promoted throughout the nation, according to James Connelly, a Fulbright research scholar based at Tsinghua University’s Dept. of Building Science.

On a provincial level, “energy retrofits with specific square-foot targets have been defined” in China’s 3-Star Green Building class, says Connelly, and the rating system is constantly being updated, especially regarding energy efficiency. A newly updated “Green Building Action Plan” is now under development.

However, regulations will “now need to get enforced in secondary and tertiary cities and county towns,” explains Seligsohn. Those cities and towns are where a lot of the country’s urbanization growth is occurring.

Alessandro Bisagni, founder and managing director at BEE inc., a company specializing in the procurement of sustainable construction materials and LEED certification consultation, agrees that local-level decisions are driving a lot of efficiencies. He says construction and building efficiency remain consistently strong, but notes, counterintuitively, that things may actually have slowed around the time of the announcement of the 12th FYP. “I believe provincial leaders didn’t want to commit to new projects until they knew what it was going to look like, especially in the more innovative industries,” Bisagni says.

Given the focus domestically on advancing and innovating technologies, global construction companies are considering how Chinese products eventually might affect them back at home.

At the fifth annual Clean Technology Investment Summit, representatives of private equity funds maintained a cautious outlook on the clean-energy industry. For one, several Chinese company representatives feared a “bad reputation” abroad for the sector in terms of finance, with the Solyndra bankruptcy precedent also hurting the listings of Chinese clean-energy company shares.

Director Guodong Jun, the director of Park Fundamental Capital, echoed the conference’s pessimistic outlook, explaining that the new energy investment category is already past its prime. Furthermore, local private-equity-fund investors are paying more attention to other environmental areas.

Seligsohn argues that more-efficient equipment is critical for these industries globally. China currently produces and sells products internationally, especially power-related equipment and the world’s most efficient coal-fired powerplants. However, she sees “not much going to the U.S., because [U.S.] companies are not buying plant equipment these days in areas of energy efficiency.”

Originally published on March 5, 2012, in the Spring 2012 Global Edition of the Engineering News-Record.

Articles by Category
  • Advertising
  • Agriculture (Sustainable)
  • Architecture
  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Beaches
  • Beijing
  • Book Reviews
  • Brazil
  • Business
  • Cars
  • China
  • China's Commodity Craving
  • Chinese Communist Party
  • Chinese Consumption
  • Cleantech
  • Commodities
  • Communication Technology
  • Copenhagen
  • Croatia
  • Emerging Markets
  • Energy
  • England
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Environment
  • Fashion
  • Film
  • Food
  • Green Food
  • Hong Kong
  • Innovation
  • International Relations
  • Israel
  • Literature
  • Munich
  • Music
  • New Media
  • New York City
  • News
  • Olympic Games 2008
  • Olympic Games 2016
  • Project Management
  • Railways
  • Real Estate
  • Recipes
  • Restaurants
  • Shanghai
  • Singapore
  • Ski
  • Taipei
  • Taiwan
  • Tea
  • Tech Transfer
  • Timor-Leste
  • Travel
  • Vegetarian Cuisine
  • Wind Energy
  • Wine
  • World Cup 2014
  • Yunnan
  • Articles by Date
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • September 2007
  • June 2007
  • October 2006
  • Articles by Publication
  • Ad Age
  • Appetite
  • Asia Business Traveller
  • Australian
  • Budget Travel
  • Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR)
  • Changi Class
  • China Daily
  • City Weekend Beijing
  • City Weekend Shanghai
  • ClimateWire
  • Condé Nast Traveler
  • EnergyWire
  • Engineering News-Record
  • Escape!
  • F&T
  • Gridskipper.com
  • Hollywood Reporter
  • Israel Strategist
  • Jewish Energy Guide
  • Junior Scholastic
  • Millionaire Asia
  • Monocle
  • New York Times
  • Newsweek
  • PM Network
  • PresenTense
  • QI Post
  • ReVista: Harvard Review of Latin America
  • Slate.com
  • STAIR: St. Antony's International Review
  • Tablet Talk
  • Time Out Beijing
  • Time Out Israel
  • Travel+Leisure Southeast Asia
  • TTG Asia
  • Verve: Eva Air's in-flight
  • ZesterDaily
  • Copyright 2009 Manuela Zoninsein. All rights reserved. Design by Yah - Powered by WP - Login